Re: HTML 3.0 suggestion

>just a question: if a HTML 3.0 demanded that List items were 
>"containerized", what percentage of HTML documents already in circulation 
>would be rendered incorrectly? 80%? 90%?
>
>INsuring backwards compatability is the number one concern.

That's no problem at all. If th closing </li> isn't there
explicitly, it's still there *implicitly*. For example,

<ul>
<li><p>foo
<li><p>bar
</ul>

and 

<ul>
<li><p>foo</p></li>
<li><p>bar</p></li>
</ul>

are equivalent.

Best regards
Rainer Klute

  Dipl.-Inform. Rainer Klute        NADS - Advertising on nets
  NADS GmbH
  Emil-Figge-Str. 80                Tel.: +49 231 9742570
D-44227 Dortmund                    Fax:  +49 231 9742573

            <http://www.nads.de/~klute/>

Received on Wednesday, 27 September 1995 12:15:31 UTC