- From: Nick Gibbins <gibbins@cpd.ntc.nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 1995 13:13:03 +0100
- To: www-html@w3.org
The NCOM proposal for the FRAME element seems to bear some similarity to the use of multiple BODY elements in Dave Raggett's draft HTML3.0 dtd from 19 Jan 1995. From html3.dtd, Thu 19-Jan-95 12:02:46 : <!-- Note that multiple body sections are permitted and that you can specify whether the section floats (as hitherto) or is fixed to one of the window sides. How should the extent of fixed body sections be specified? The idea here is to allow authors to divide the browser window up into one or more fixed panes which don't scroll with the rest of the document. These can be used for navigation elements, for copyright and security messages (e.g. company confidential) or for brand messages/icons. --> <!ELEMENT BODY O O %body.content> <!ATTLIST BODY %attrs; position (left|right|top|bottom|float) float background %URI; #IMPLIED -- texture tile for document background -- > <!ELEMENT HEAD O O (%head.content)> <!ENTITY % html.content "HEAD, BODY+"> <!ELEMENT HTML O O (%html.content)> In the most recent draft dtd (24 Mar 1995), the content model of HTML does not allow multiple BODY elements; the BANNER element seems to provide some of this functionality, but not all (position control could be provided through the use of style sheets). For what reason were multiple BODYs removed from the dtd, and would this have any effect on the use of FRAMEs? -- Nick Gibbins gibbins@cpd.ntc.nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 20 September 1995 08:19:57 UTC