RE: Concealed HTML source

Of course the simplist way is to use generic links etc and 
use an image map!

 Then no exposed code!

Nicole


On Fri, 6 Oct 1995 22:20:47 -0400  Danyel Ceccaldi wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>As I understood it, in which way you decide to provide
>HTML-code, if it is by giving a URL you will ever be able
>to view the code by an client which is able to recieve
>resources given by its URL.
>And even if you decide to implement your own client reading
>encrypted html-files not readable by other browsers, 
someone
>will be able to decrypt your encrypted files.
>
>If your only intention is to make sure that no one is 
'stealing'
>resources linked by some anchors in your html-files, you 
can
>configure your HTML-server to require the 
'Referer'-http-header-field
>and providing data only if the link is activated from a 
registered
>referer-resource.
>
>Of course this will cause some problems, and isn't the 
perfect way,
>but in general it should be a possibility to 'hide' resources from
>non-experts on the web.
>
>The other possibility is to create an own client who deals information
>in a way not compatible with HTML or HTTP.
>
>Anyway I don't know, if it would be better to move this discussion to
>a newsgroup related to this issue, because IMHO the only thing you can
>get from this mailing list is the information that in general you
>will be able to view any HTML-code located by a URL.
>
>
>by Danny
>

                              ,,,                           
    This message was sent    (o o)  10/06/95  21:52:54  By
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-oOOo-(_)-oOOo-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-   ******      nicole@webweaver.net     
    * *****         http://www.charm.net/~altera/           
     * * *     nicole@netvertise.com 
        *           http://www.charm.net/~creative/
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-  ++   STRONG ENOUGH 
FOR A MAN, BUT MADE FOR A WOMAN   ++

Received on Friday, 6 October 1995 21:48:54 UTC