- From: Brian Behlendorf <brian@organic.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 May 1995 13:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@nttc.edu>
- Cc: Multiple recipients of list <www-html@www10.w3.org>
On Mon, 22 May 1995, Murray Altheim wrote: > I tend to agree that inline HTML could raise some major problems, both > technical and legal. I prefer managing it somehow through the editing > process, rather than by server or browser, especially since there are a > *LOT* of servers and browsers that currently don't handle it, and a break > would create a serious deficiency in the ability to read a document. Sorry to sound like a broken record, but content negotiation *will* take care of this. If this is a part of HTML 3.0, then an HTML 3.0->HTML 2.0 converter in the server will make this transparant, though this conversion would have to be done at access time instead of beforehand, just like - surprise! - NCSA-style server-side includes. Legal problems... could you elaborate? Brian --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-- brian@organic.com brian@hyperreal.com http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/
Received on Monday, 22 May 1995 16:08:30 UTC