- From: Murray Altheim <murray.altheim@nttc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 17:54:44 -0400
- To: www-html@www10.w3.org
- Cc: "Jason B. Thatcher" <jthatche@mailer.fsu.edu>
>I agree with the message on leaving the column issue browser specific. If >this is such a hot issue... simply throw it into two very large table columns >and let the words wrap. They should fit pages across systems... granted I >lack unix experience on this one... [...] >Philosophically, I think the fixes are already present in html for most of >the column issues. You just need to think creatively!!! > >Don't mean to sound snotty, but sometimes the best trick is leaving the >markup alone... and ensuring you effectively communicate information >across mediums. > >Jason Thatcher IMO, the whole issue of columns is not one of content markup at all. Newspapers use columns to enhance readability, not for style. They receive their content over the AP/UPI/Reuters wire and flow it onto their pages in the best manner possible to get the message across. As content providers we too should be concerned with expressing the content, not the specifics on how it is read. Use of HTML as more than content markup has been hashed to death here and elsewhere. Other formats such as postscript are more suitable for precisely and explicitly defining the appearance of a page. If the issue is truly readability, then use of columns should be a browser-specified option, ie., if your monitor is capable of displaying 240 character lines, your browser might have an option to wrap the text onto three 80 character width columns. Otherwise, columns make no sense whatsoever as markup; window widths may vary from five inches to thirty. Specifying three columns of text on a 20" window may be sensible, but others (including braille readers, as was pointed out by Ron Marriage) would have difficulty reading the text. And to what end? Readability? I was particularly pleased with the June 16th HTML 2.0 DTD. It again resisted the numerous efforts to extend HTML to death. I hope HTML 3.0 doesn't become the undoing of the Web by nature of its added complications. The usability of the Web deteriorates when the content becomes too complicated or based on non-standard markup, and while some seem unconcerned about these issues (especially given the current popularity of Netscape), long term viability of the Web depends on standardization. I apologize to those who feel like I'm beating a dead horse, but this issue just keeps kicking. And I never apologize for a bad pun... Murray _________________________________________ Murray M. Altheim, Information Systems Analyst National Technology Transfer Center, Wheeling, West Virginia email: murray.altheim@nttc.edu www: http://ogopogo.nttc.edu/people/maltheim/maltheim.html
Received on Thursday, 29 June 1995 10:40:42 UTC