- From: Core Systems <Core.Systems@amgen.com>
- Date: 26 Jun 1995 17:07:05 U
- To: "kitblake" <kitblake@gig.nl>, www-html@www10.w3.org
Mail*Link(r) SMTP RE>Multiple columns/ all this talk about pixels >>1280x1024 screen my browser comes up 780 wide by 892 high. >Wrong assumption: I work on an Indy - 1280x1024. And I still find 800 pixel >line lengths hard to read. This whole conversation seems to be predicated on "pixel" as a unit of measure. Although it is true that current browsers interpret images as have a width and height measured in pixels, measuring anything in pixels should be considered a temporary hack to be repaired as soon as possible. Others have already pointed out that FIG will use real-world units. I don't think it would break any rules if browsers also interpreted current html images, rules, etc. as being measured in printers points (which just happen to by 72 per inch, a nice match to a typical 72dpi screen resolution) rather than pixels. If a user wants a different scaling, a "lens" mapping (applied to both text and images) is appropriate. --Michal ------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------ Received: by amgen.com with SMTP;26 Jun 1995 10:12:40 U Received: from amgen.com by dune.amgen.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA07816; Mon, 26 Jun 1995 10:01:17 -0700 Received: from www19 (www19.w3.org) by amgen.com (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id AA10152; Mon, 26 Jun 1995 10:01:15 -0700 Received: by www19 (5.0/NSCS-1.0S) id AA22189; Mon, 26 Jun 1995 12:54:53 -0400 X-Sender: young@aleta.cs.purdue.edu Message-Id: <v01510102ac1494d1fcfd@[128.10.9.72]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 11:58:23 -0500 To: kitblake@gig.nl (kitblake), www-html@www10.w3.org From: young@cs.purdue.edu (Michal Young) Subject: RE: Multiple columns/ all this talk about pixels X-Mailing-List: <www-html@mail.w3.org> archive/latest/941 X-Loop: www-html@mail.w3.org Sender: www-html@www10.w3.org Precedence: list
Received on Monday, 26 June 1995 20:10:46 UTC