- From: kitblake <kitblake@gig.nl>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 15:35:27 +0100
- To: www-html@www10.w3.org
>At 4:05 PM 6/23/95, kitblake/Kurt Foss wrote: > >>The Problem is Acrobat generates very large files, especially with pictures. > >What do you consider "very large?" A forthcoming Netscape Navigator will >allow one to download separate pages from a pdf file rather than the entire >file, if a user wants only a portion. Too many sites today fail to break up >their pdf docs so folks can snag smaller portions if they so choose, in >addition to the full doc. I frequently download the (Acrobat) Internet Edition of the NYTimes. Eight pages, three little pictures and it's 100k. A portion has the same ratio. If I request one page, it's 12k, when it would be 3k in HTML. I download those same three pictures every day. Again. (One is the header, and two are advertisements, which don't change very often.) But there is a point here. Browsers (at least, Netscape) will also handle Java applets. And eventually other things - inlined movies, etc. These are objects that (private) users can make with little investment. Acrobat is expensive, and while I am not criticizing the product, unless Adobe releases a shareware version (a la Netscape), I don't see Acrobat as a solution to Web page design. I'm a fortunate individual, with a fast corporate link and powerful processors at my disposal. But it's not just myself that I'm thinking about in looking for viable solutions. kitblake
Received on Monday, 26 June 1995 09:34:58 UTC