- From: Mike Meyer <mwm@contessa.phone.net>
- Date: Sun, 4 Jun 95 11:40:31 PST
- To: www-html@www10.w3.org
> I agree, if you try to fill the whole screen then it might cause some > hassles for some people. But, that should really be an issue for the > browsers' developers, I think. Probably off topic, since HTML probably > won't control the amount of the screen being used. This is absolutely, dead on accurate. Now, in that context, consider this statement: > > I don't think this should go into HTML. I you want to view text in multiple > > columns than instruct your browser to format it thus. > > I disagree. I like the idea of being able to use columns in a document. You see the problem - you can't control page width. I carefully configure browsers I use regularly to have pages that have a line width that I find nice and readable. If you come along and split this into two or three columns, the results are going to be *ugly*. This ignores the problems of doing columns when you don't know how many lines of text are going to be formatted into each column. Nothing keeps you from writing a browser now that reads standard HTML and lays it out in n-column "pages" for you to read. I've printed standard HTML as 2-column text before; it works ok (modulo header gifs that expect to span an entire page). Now, keeping all that in mind - can you propose a way of definining columns that 1) gives you the control you want; 2) doesn't require scrolling in from one end to the other (in either direction) to read; and 3) isn't just a "lay this stuff out in n columns to fit the display"? <mike
Received on Sunday, 4 June 1995 14:49:39 UTC