- From: R J Partington <rjp@heffer.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 6 Aug 1995 19:27:27 +0100 (BST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
(Forgive me if I make horrendous blunders... please...) Isn't HTML supposed to be content, rather than presentation, based? That is, you describe the *content* of a document, rather than how it looks? This then gives you a `better' document because then (assuming you did it right) you can get a list of variables easily because they're surrounded by <var></var> pairs? If so, (referring to Joe English's message about the new HTML 3 features being supported), why does HTML 3 seem to be tending toward the presentation-specifying `model'? I can't see how the <center> tag is part of a content-based document, or how > <UL SRC="greenball.gif"> is either. To me, these just seem like pure presentation `niceties'. Similarly the > <HR src="redline.gif"> Is this a consequence of the Netscape monopoly, whereby Netscapisms are virtually forced into HTML 3 onwards purely because of the number of people who've used them rather than there being a need for them? Or have I got this totally the wrong way around? rob -- a confused www-html list reader
Received on Sunday, 6 August 1995 14:27:49 UTC