- From: Joe English <jenglish@crl.com>
- Date: Sat, 05 Aug 1995 22:56:27 -0700
- To: www-html@w3.org
Just wondering which browsers if any currently support the following features from the HTML 3 draft: * element IDs * SRC attribute on LI, UL, HR, and others * the <DIV> element * CLASS attributes While these are not as sexy as tables, centered text, and stylesheets, they will be very useful for creating robust and long-lived documents. I'm wondering when it will be safe for authors to use, for example, <UL SRC="greenball.gif"> instead of <DL> and multiple copies of <DT><IMG SRC="greenball.gif"> or some other form of tag abuse to get the effects they want; or <DIV ID=foo> instead of an empty <A NAME=FOO> at the beginning of a section; or <HR src="redline.gif"> instead of <BR><IMG SRC="redline.gif" ALT="-------------------------"><BR>. (The latter construct seems to be less popular lately, thanks mostly to Netscape's <HR> enhancements; now that authors have something there to play with they're less tempted to say <IMG> when they mean <HR>. This is another case where NHTML has improved rather than degraded the average quality of the HTML on the Web.) These features would be really easy to support. Just look for element IDs in addition to <A>nchor NAMEs when resolving URL fragments, and treat <HR> like <IMG> if it has a SRC attribute. (<UL SRC=> and <LI SRC=> may be a bit trickier, but it's gotta be easier than, say, TABLEs, which many browsers can do now.) Minimal support for CLASS and <DIV> is trivial: just fail to barf when encountering them. So in a sense, most browsers do support <DIV> and CLASS, but it would be nice if <DIV ID=foo>, <DIV ALIGN=CENTER>, etc., worked as expected. --Joe English jenglish@crl.com
Received on Sunday, 6 August 1995 01:57:09 UTC