- From: <lee@sq.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Apr 1995 14:22:31 -0400
- To: rhiemeir@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de, www-html@www10.w3.org
Joerg Rhiemeier <rhiemeir@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de> > Thomas Mohr <mohr@lts.sel.alcatel.de> wrote: > [...] > >This is interesting. As far as I know, NCSA does not consider > >NCSA Mosaic code as free (they have signed a contract with > >Spyglass). > > Actually, the situation has become MUCH worse than that: Spyglass have sold > the code to MICRO$OFT. Guess what they'll do about NCSA Mosaic as soon as > they have MS Mosaic out! Currently, NCSA shells out betas for evaluation > purposes (as Netscape does), but I assume that MS will stomp that out VERY > quickly. This is (fortunately) unadulterated nonsense, peppered with facts :-) I'll let people from NCSA and W3C respond with something more formal or more accurate, but suffice it to say: * Spyglass has indeed licenced source of Mosaic to Microsoft. This does not imply a reduction in Spyglass' rights in any way. They simply have one more customer, who happens to be rather large. * NCSA continutes to work on Mosaic. Version 2.5 has been released, and version 2.6 is in beta. * NCSA have never (as far as I can tell) considered Mosaic to be free. It was (and remains) freely available for non-commercial use. NCSA used to licence it for commercial use, but after about ten licencees, poor Joseph and Larry -- and presumably others -- were getting too busy, and spending too much time in meetings, and arranged for Spyglass to handle that side of things. * There is no evidence that the Microsoft deal with affect NCSA in any specific way. > The last free version of NCSA Mosaic was 2.4, which was released before > they sold their code to Spyglass. * See above; this simply isn't true. > There are some improved versions coming > from places like Tuebingen University which are based on NCSA Mosaic 2.4, > but I fear Micro$oft's law department will find a way to illegalize these > versions as well. * I can't imagine any way in which they could do that, even if they wanted to. Where is the business advantage for Microsoft in doing that?? Lee -- Liam Quin, SoftQuad Inc +1 416 239 4801 lee@sq.com <URL:http://www.sq.com/> HexSweeper NeWS game;OPEN LOOK+XView+mf-fonts FAQs;lq-text unix text retrieval SoftQuad HoTMetaL/HTML Editor; SoftQuad Panorama/WWW SGML Viewer
Received on Monday, 17 April 1995 14:23:09 UTC