- From: <ADMINISTRATOR.ROUTER@occshost.nlm.nih.gov>
- Date: Thu, 13 Apr 95 03:04:00 EST
- To: www-html@www10.w3.org
This message could not be imported to cc:Mail. The original message follows: *** Start of undeliverable message *** Message: 999999999 From: www-html@www10.w3.org@INTERNET at SMTPCC Date: 04/13/95 03:04AM To: roberta alberding at OCCSPOST *** Unknown message recipient *** Subject: Contents: *** No message recipients *** 999999999 Text item: 1442 Once upon a time you, Trond Are Undem, wrote: --> --> On Tue, 4 Apr 1995, Jeffrey Hobbs wrote: --> --> > >What's right to use according to the standard and standards to come of --> > >the following: --> > > --> > > <P></P>, <LI></LI>, <DT></DT>, <DD></DD> --> > > --> > >or without closing tags --> > --> > Browsers should handle these with or without closing tags, but editors --> > _should_ generate perfect HTML, meaning they should write it out with --> > close tags. --> --> I see ... thanks for your help :) --> Well, not having the closing tags for <P>, <LI> etc *is* perfect HTML. >From the DTD: <!ELEMENT P - O (%text)+> <!ELEMENT DT - O (%text)+> <!ELEMENT DD - O %flow;> <!ELEMENT LI - O %flow; -- list item --> The `-' after the element name indicates the opening tag is required, the `O' in the second field after the name indicates the closing tag is optional. Hence, using <P>, <LI>, <DT> and <DD> without </P>, </LI>, </DT> and </DD> *is* perfect HTML. Abigail --------------- Start RFC822 Headers --------------- Received: by occshost.nlm.nih.gov (5.65+/1.3) id 21803.AA; Thu, 13 Apr 95 03:04:01 GMT Date: Thu, 13 Apr 95 03:04:01 GMT From: www-html@www10.w3.org@occshost Message-Id: <9504130304.21803.AA@occshost.nlm.nih.gov> Content-Length: 0 Apparently-To: <roberta_alberding@occshost.nlm.nih.gov> --------------- End RFC822 Headers ---------------
Received on Thursday, 13 April 1995 03:06:02 UTC