- From: Michael C. Grant <mcgrant@gomez.stanford.edu>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 1994 18:49:20 -0700
- To: mosaic-x@ncsa.uiuc.edu, www-html@www0.cern.ch, nikos@cbl.leeds.ac.uk
One of the problems with using in-line images to render equations is that you can't easily align the baselines of the text with the baselines of the equations. To see what I mean, look at http://www-isl.stanford.edu/~mcgrant/equations/usegifs/qcqp2.html (I don't have transparent gif files yet so the equations have a white background. This actually helps to illustrate the point better, though). This is an "illegal" document of sorts, because it uses illegal values for ALIGN which I talk about below. But, if your reader defaults to ALIGN=BOTTOM in such cases you will get the desired effect. For each of the in-text equations, you should notice that they are shifted up by as much as 5 pixels depending on the length of the descenders. (I also happen to think that the equations are rendered poorly. I think that this can be improved considerably on the LaTeX2HTML end, by using Metafont to generate lower-resolution fonts, so I'm not so concerned about that yet). If you read http://www-isl.stanford.edu/~mcgrant/equations/Welcome.html and especially the section called "Arbitrary baseline alignment" for in-line images, you will see my proposed solution to this problem. There is also a link there to a patch to a SINGLE FILE in libhtmlw, HTMLformat.c, which adds this functionality. The link is http://www-isl.stanford.edu/~mcgrant/equations/HTMLformat.diffs Try the patch out, and look at the example document above once more. The improvement should be marked! If you want to see a nicer looking document without the white backgrounds on the gifs, try http://www-isl.stanford.edu/~mcgrant/equations/usegifs/qcqp2.html It is the same document, but it uses xbms which are much larger. I think this is a rather simple enhancement to HTML, as the simplicity of the patch demonstrates. I really think that in the long run it will make a big difference for documents with equations, so I hope the HTML+ discussion group will consider it. Thanks for listening, Michael C. Grant mcgrant@rascals.stanford.edu
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 1994 03:49:31 UTC