- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@stonehand.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 94 22:52:08 -0500
- To: James C Deikun <jcdst10+@pitt.edu>
- Cc: Multiple recipients of list <www-html@www0.cern.ch>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 1994 22:21:31 -0500 (EST) From: James C Deikun <jcdst10+@pitt.edu> The memory footprint for a fully validating SGML parser would be trivially greater than that for a simply functional one. I must disagree. Compare a full SGML parser which supports SUBDOC, LINK, a full entity manager, alternate SGML declarations, and arbitrary DTD parsing to a parser which employs a pre-parsed DTD with a fixed base set, has limited entity support, doesn't support SUBDOC or LINK, etc., and I think you'll find a vast difference in memory footprints. Do the numbers. Regards, Glenn Adams
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 1994 04:52:36 UTC