- From: Daniel W. Connolly <connolly@hal.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 1994 11:10:45 -0600
- To: foulser@zymurgy.boston.sgi.com
- Cc: Multiple recipients of list <www-html@www0.cern.ch>
In message <199412131648.LAA01909@zymurgy.boston.sgi.com>, Dave Foulser writes: > >I agree that servers should serve valid HTML, but disagree that they >should contain validation code. You only need to validate a piece of >HTML once, whereas you typically serve it many more times. Right. > Thus I'd >suggest a three-pronged approach: > >1. validation tool for hand-written HTML As an example, please see: http://www.hal.com/~markg/HaLSoft/html-check/ I use this in combination with CVS to maintain my web space: I have a development copy of my documents, and when I think they're ready for release, I do: % cvs commit the cvs commitinfo config file fires up html-check on *.html, and if any of them aren't valid, the commit bombs out. I fix the errors, and try again. Works good. Give it a try! Dan
Received on Tuesday, 13 December 1994 18:17:50 UTC