- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@stonehand.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Dec 94 15:15:39 -0500
- To: patrick@voyager.gate.net
- Cc: Multiple recipients of list <www-html@www0.cern.ch>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 1994 00:30:06 +0100 From: patrick@voyager.gate.net (Patrick Stickler) that furthermore, browsers become strict in their parsing of HTML document instances, notifying the user/reader when a document instance is invalid (rather than trying to guess around the HTML errors). In keeping with a fundamental tenet of the Internet (or at least one that used to hold), the WWW should be "conservative in transmitting, and liberal in receiving." According to this view, the HTTP servers should be the component which ensures that only valid HTML is transmitted. So we need to bang on the server builders/providers! However, if a few popular browswers validated prior to display, it would put pressure on the server/data providers. The practical problem with putting a validator in the browser is size and performance penalties. I think this is another argument for pushing validation onto the server. -- Glenn Adam
Received on Saturday, 3 December 1994 21:16:20 UTC