Re: More HTML3 DTD

Joe English wrote:
>michaelj@relay.relay.com (Michael Johnson) wrote:
>>                  Why has the TR element been made into a container?
>
>Probably to avoid the storm of protest that
>arose when <P> was changed from a separator
>into a container.

OK, I can buy that. My concern was that translation from some other GMLs is
made more difficult by TR being a container. I'm thinking specifically of
IBM BookMaster here, which uses its table row separator element in the same
way that HTML+ does (did).

Michael Johnson
Relay Technology, Inc.

Received on Friday, 2 December 1994 13:32:19 UTC