Re: More HTML3 DTD from Michael Johnson on 1994-12-02 (www-html@w3.org from December 1994)

From: Michael Johnson <michaelj@relay.relay.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 94 07:29:16 EST
To: www-html@www0.cern.ch (HTML discussion list)
Message-Id: <MICHAELJ.941202072916@relay.relay.com>

Joe English wrote:
>michaelj@relay.relay.com (Michael Johnson) wrote:
>>                  Why has the TR element been made into a container?
>
>Probably to avoid the storm of protest that
>arose when <P> was changed from a separator
>into a container.

OK, I can buy that. My concern was that translation from some other GMLs is
made more difficult by TR being a container. I'm thinking specifically of
IBM BookMaster here, which uses its table row separator element in the same
way that HTML+ does (did).

Michael Johnson
Relay Technology, Inc.

Received on Friday, 2 December 1994 13:32:19 UTC