- From: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
- Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 13:07:07 +0300
- To: www-html-editor@w3.org
Hello, While considering importing XHTML Modularization DTDs for use with local catalogs of the W3C markup validator, I found the following public id related issues with it (applies to REC-xhtml-modularization-20081008, ED-xhtml- modularization-20091007, and the currently available files at http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/) 1) xhtml.cat refers to the following modules/DTDs which are not included in the REC-xhtml-modularization-20081008 or ED-xhtml-modularization-20091007 downloadable tarballs: xhtml-ruby-1.mod, xhtml11-arch.dtd, xhtml-redecl-1.mod. (This is not an issue for http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml.cat, just the tarballs.) 2) xhtml.cat has this public id for xhtml-edit-1.mod: "-//W3C//ELEMENTS XHTML Editing Elements 1.0//EN" ...but the module itself has in its comments: "-//W3C//ELEMENTS XHTML Editing Markup 1.0//EN" ...and the latter is not in xhtml.cat. Which one of these should the public id for xhtml-edit-1.mod be? Should the comment in module or the catalog be corrected, or are both good and both should be included in xhtml.cat? A quick web search produces hits for both public ids in the wild. 3) Similarly as 2) above, xhtml.cat has this public id for xhtml-bdo-1.mod: "-//W3C//ELEMENTS XHTML BIDI Override Element 1.0//EN" ...but the module itself has in its comments: "-//W3C//ELEMENTS XHTML BDO Element 1.0//EN" ...and the latter is not in xhtml.cat. Which one of these should the public id for xhtml-bdo-1.mod be? Should the comment in the module or the catalog be corrected, or are both good and both should be included in xhtml.cat? A quick web search produces hits for both public ids in the wild. Ville
Received on Sunday, 25 October 2009 10:07:38 UTC