OK Re: [curie] [editorial] [process nit] don't say it isn't stable

On 11 Feb 2008, at 2:49 PM, Shane McCarron wrote:

> Al,
>
> Editor's drafts, prior to a publication for last call, in general  
> should ALWAYS say they are not stable. A formal, published working  
> draft will convey the appropriate sense of stability.

Got it.  As I understand your
reply, this is pre-publication language that
will change in the move to in Last Call on TR.

Al

>
> Al Gilman wrote:
>>
>>
>> The language
>> <q cite='http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-curie-20080122/#status'>
>> It is not yet stable,
>> </q>
>> is IMHO inconsistent with the Working Group's decision to go to
>> Last Call.
>>
>> The status paragraph should communicate the WG's consensus
>> that the specification is fit for implementation, and
>> this is a Last Call to test if the wider Web community
>> concurs.
>>
>> Al
>
> -- 
> Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
> Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
> ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
>
>

Received on Monday, 11 February 2008 20:56:19 UTC