- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 11:42:51 -0500
- To: www-html-editor@w3.org
HTML has long had a separator feature called <hr />. In the current draft, it seems to be renamed <separator />. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml2-20060726/mod-structural.html#edef_structural_separator That's consistent with the roadmap draft of 2007/06/29, which notes plans to redesign "legacy" HTML features without a preference for compatibility with existing practice: "The third step in XHTML development is to develop a next generation markup language, namely XHTML 2.0. The design goal of XHTML 2.0 is to use XML-generic technologies as much as possible. In this version the Working Group will clean up legacy features, and redesign them where appropriate." -- http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/xhtml-roadmap/ But it introduces a cost to using an unrelated XHTML 2 features; why should someone have to rename all of their <hr /> elements to <separator /> in order to use <section> or XForms? A more cost-effective design is to keep the <hr /> markup as it is, but to document it as a separator or "hypertext rest" rather than "horizontal rule". FYIU, this was discussed, informally, a while ago. From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 19:56:19 +0100 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2005Jun/0033.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 16:43:05 UTC