- From: David Håsäther <hasather@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:13:11 +0200
- To: "David Meredith" <dave@titanmusic.com>
- Cc: www-html-editor@w3.org
On 3/28/07, David Meredith <dave@titanmusic.com> wrote: > However, I think there should be a question mark after the "(title, > %head.misc;)" to indicate that the base element can occur on its own without > a title element. That is, I believe the definition should be as follows: > > <!ELEMENT head (%head.misc;, > ((title, %head.misc;, (base, %head.misc;)?) | > (base, %head.misc;, (title, %head.misc;)?)))> > > Is that right? No, a title element is required. -- David Håsäther
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2007 16:13:44 UTC