Shouln't the root element of XHTML 2 be... xhtml?

From: Andrés <adelfino@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 19:39:01 -0300
To: www-html-editor@w3.org
Message-ID: <4d90013f0703081439q17364710sc240a8727b46f887@mail.gmail.com>

I don't understand why the new version still refers to HTML, since it
is backwards incompatible. Is there any reason for this?

IMHO, a xhtml root element is more appropriate.

Greetings.

Received on Thursday, 8 March 2007 22:39:09 UTC