- From: Vicente Luque Centeno <vlc@it.uc3m.es>
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 17:38:16 +0100 (CET)
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- cc: www-html-editor@w3.org, Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2007 16:38:33 UTC
Thanks. However, why don't the fieldset and legend elements make sense in XHTML Print? Best regards. Vicente Luque Centeno Dep. Ingeniería Telemática Universidad Carlos III de Madrid http://www.it.uc3m.es/vlc On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Shane McCarron wrote: > Basic forms was designed to provide a simple subset of forms - something > readily supportable on devices with limited processing and display > capabilities. Those elements - in particular optgroup - did not call into > that collection. > Vicente Luque Centeno wrote: >> >> In XHTML Print 1.0, elements like fieldset, legend and optgroup are >> not allowed. Steven kindly told me that XHTML Print 1.0 uses the Basic >> Forms module from XHTML Modularization (which does not recognize such >> elements). Can someone explain why these elements were rejected from >> the Basic Forms module from XHTML Modularization? Wouldn't it be wiser to >> have fieldset, legend and optgroup allowed in the Basic Forms module? >> >> Thanks. >> >> Vicente Luque Centeno >> Dep. Ingeniería Telemática >> Universidad Carlos III de Madrid >> http://www.it.uc3m.es/vlc > > -- > Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 > Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 > ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2007 16:38:33 UTC