Re: [ot] Re: [XHTML 2.0] Only one emphasis tag

Le 25 sept. 06 à 16:41, Jens Meiert a écrit :

>
>> <em> and <strong> really are just two variations on the same idea,
>> emphasis. Two tags could be merged as one.
>
> Can't keep back: And yet you still mean elements, not tags [1].  
> (The urge to write yet another article on that [2] has obviously  
> been justified. What's going on.)

Quoting Anne (<http://annevankesteren.nl/2004/05/tags-vs-elements>):
> <p> and </p> are tags.
>
> <p>Some text</p> is an element
I'm talking about "<em> and <strong>" (not about <em>Some text</em>  
and <strong>Some text</strong>). So tag is the right word. But thank  
you for pointing out Anne's article, it is very useful.

-- 
</david_latapie>
http://blog.empyree.org/   U+0F00

Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 15:24:20 UTC