- From: David Latapie <david@empyree.org>
- Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 15:27:35 +0200
- To: www-html-editor@w3.org
Hello, Le 5 août 06 à 17:30, Dave Hodder a écrit : > I believe it would be beneficial to create at least one more > version of XHTML 1.x to (i) help ease the transition from XHTML 1.0 > to XHTML 2.0 good idea. Help for transition is what XHTML 2.0 needs the most. Below, if I do not quoted a part, it is either because I'm OK, or don't have any idea on the question. > * No longer mark the Style Attribute Module as deprecated. why? It appears to me as a kind of regression > * Add a module for the lang attribute, as found in XHTML 1.0. (This > would be in addition to the existing xml:lang attribute.) err. Basically undoing one of XHTML 1.1 thing. It would be better to find a way for xml:lang to be used with CSS. > * Add the XHTML Target Module, but with a warning noting that misuse > of both @target and frames can cause accessibility issues. A quick remainder of its uses, please? > * Add @xml:id (in addition to the existing id attribute). It > wouldn't > do any harm, though user agents accepting contents as "text/html" > shouldn't be expected to do anything with it. Could you elaborate on the reasons for doing this? -- </david_latapie> http://blog.empyree.org/ U+0F00
Received on Sunday, 6 August 2006 13:27:49 UTC