- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 13:54:28 +0200
- To: jasper.magick@gmail.com
- Cc: www-html-editor@w3.org
We have been assured by informed sources that Google will be processing documents served as application/xhtml+xml by this Summer. Best wishes, Steven Pemberton On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 16:57:54 +0200, Shane McCarron <xhtml2-issues@mn.aptest.com> wrote: > > This sounds like a problem with Google. As XHTML use expands, it seems > likely > Google and others will process the content. The XML community has > requested, > and the HTML Working Group agrees, that XML content should not be ever > served > as > text/html. Neither XHTML 1.1 nor XHTML 2 can be served with that > content type. > >> From: magick <jasper.magick@gmail.com> >> To: www-html-editor@w3.org >> Subject: Question about XHTML 2.0 and content type >> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 21:18:15 -0500 >> Message-id: <43E16BE7.3020807@gmail.com> >> X-Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/43E16BE7.3020807@gmail.com >> >> Will XHTML 2.0 *have* to be sent as "application/xhtml+xml" (or one of >> the other XML content types) or will it be allowed to be sent as >> "text/html"? >> >> The main reason I'm asking this, is because after doing some tests I >> realized that Google Adsense will not display on any page sending out >> "application/xhtml+xml" as the content type. Which would mean loss of >> revune. >> >> I'm very interested in using XHTML 2.0 when it is finished and a doctype >> is made for it, but I'd prefer to use "text/html" if I can. >> >> So just wondering if the rules will be the same as XHTML 1.0 in which >> it's allowed for websites to send the document as "text/html" as long as >> certain compatibility guidelines are followed. Or if the rules will be >> the same as XHTML 1.1 in which "text/html" is in violation of the >> specification, and you can only use "application/xhtml+xml" as the >> content type. >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2006 11:54:45 UTC