- From: Shane McCarron <xhtml2-issues@mn.aptest.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 09:45:15 -0500
- To: mike.agnes@gmail.com
- CC: www-html-editor@w3.org
Can you please send us an example? The working group cannot come up with an example where there would be a difference. > From: Mike Agnes <mike.agnes@gmail.com> > To: www-html-editor@w3.org > Subject: XHTML 2.0: Text Module/<l> vs. <br /> element > Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:13:46 -0500 > Message-ID: <8cb3bc2f0602130513p62588d6ao705706ac279486bb@mail.gmail.com> > X-Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/8cb3bc2f0602130513p62588d6ao705706ac279486bb@mail.gmail.com > > The new <l> element is a logical addition and marks semantic content. > However, in presentation of text there is often the need, for content > reasons, > to start a new line of text that semantically has no ending until the end of > the paragraph. > The intent of such a line break does not correspond to the intention of the > <l> element > and additionally may present rendering problems vis css. > > Any human text editor will confirm the need to retain the <br /> element. > > Mike Agnes > >
Received on Wednesday, 5 April 2006 14:47:20 UTC