- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:10:21 +0100
- To: Tim Bray <Tim.Bray@Sun.COM>
- Cc: www-html-editor@w3.org, w3c-html-wg@w3.org, voyager-issues@mn.aptest.com
* Tim Bray wrote: >>> Currently, the draft says *nothing* about xml:space (unless I'm >>> mis-using the search function). If you read the specification for >>> xml:space (http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-white-space), all it says >>> is that this is a message from the author to downstream software. So >>> there is nothing anywhere that says anything normative about >>> xml:space. >> >> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2004/xhtml-faq#xmlspace cites a quite >> different opinion on this matter... > >Yes, well that opinion is (a) specific to HTML and (b) wrong. I'm >amazed that the W3C allowed that to be published. -Tim (Redirecting to the relevant mailing lists, etc) I thought so, too: http://hades.mn.aptest.com/cgi-bin/voyager-issues/Modularization-DTDs?id=6300#followup2 Maybe the HTML Working Group can reconsider this position in the light of Tim's disagreement? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Monday, 31 January 2005 16:10:55 UTC