- From: <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:28:30 -0700
- To: mimasa@w3.org
- Cc: www-html-editor@w3.org
- Message-Id: <OFD52904F3.F32E33B5-ON8825702F.00650CDA-8825702F.00657CCE@KP.ORG>
> Because we are still working over minor details to make Schema > modularization really work, based on implementation feedback. > We published "Modularization of XHTML in XML Schema" and it went > through Last Call [2], and then we published "Modularization of > XHTML 1.0 - Second Edition" as a Working Draft [3] which > incorporated XML Schemas as promised. As soon as we finish > necessary editing, we expect to advance "Modularization of XHTML > 1.0 - Second Edition" to Proposed Edited Recommendation, and > that should happen pretty soon. Stay tuned. > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xhtml-modularization-20010410 > > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xhtml-m12n-schema-20031003 > [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xhtml-modularization-20040218 Thanx for the update. What got me looking for these schemas is that Michael Sperberg-McQueen mentioned to me that there were problems because at least one schema processor wasrejecting the schema documents (partly because of circular includes). As circular includes are perfectly OK per the schema spec...and the processor in question has no problems with circular includes...I thought I'd try to figure out what was actually going on. If you need any help in "debugging" the schema documents, by all means, let me know, I'd be glad to help. pvb
Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2005 18:42:46 UTC