- From: David Håsäther <hasather@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 17:00:34 +0200
- To: www-html@w3.org
- CC: www-html-editor@w3.org
I've been reading through the XHTML 2.0 WD, and I'm going to post some comments on it here. Sorry if these has been posted before. Also, I might have been overly pedantic in some places :-) I'm sending this to both www-html and www-html-editor. 1. In the introduction, under "1.2. Major Differences with XHTML 1"[1] (third list item, second paragraph, starting with "If the resource...") it says: [...] or because images have been turned off) then the element is used instead. This should not talk about images alone, as it goes for any type of resource, and should also say "then the element[s content] is used instead" as it says in "XHTML Embedding Attributes Module"[2] 2. In "Module Definition Conventions", shouldn't "5.4. Content Types"[3] say "5.4 Content Models" instead? Also, in the paragraph under that heading, it says: [...] the symbol used for text is PCDATA. This is a term, defined in the XML 1.0 Recommendation, that refers to processed character data. Although it's not really wrong to call it "processed character data", why isn't the usual meaning "parsed character data" used? 3. In the "XHTML List Module"[4], the content model for dl is: label?, (( dt | dd)+ | di+) This means that the definition data can appear before the term, which would be illogical. This should be changed to: label?, ((dt, dd)+ | di+) Also, the content model for di is: ( dt+, dd*) This means that no definition data is required. Unless there is a specific reason for this, it should be changed to: (dt, dd)+ In the same page, under "11.4. The li element"[5] it says: When the href attribute is defined, the contents of the list item become a selectable link, just as an a element with an href attribute would be. However, I think this is pretty clear already, and also, the spec doesn't say this for any other element type. 4. In the definition for xml:base[6] in "XHTML Hypertext Attributes Module", the list for inheritance of URI base information should be an ordered list. The same goes for the xml:lang attribute in "XHTML I18N Attribute Module"[7] [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xhtml2-20040722/introduction.html#s_intro_differences> [2] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xhtml2-20040722/mod-embedding.html#s_embeddingmodule> [3] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xhtml2-20040722/abstraction.html#s_common_types> [4] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xhtml2-20040722/mod-list.html> [5] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xhtml2-20040722/mod-list.html#sec_11.4.> [6] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xhtml2-20040722/mod-hyperAttributes.html#adef_hyperAttributes_xml:base> [7] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xhtml2-20040722/mod-i18n.html> -- David Håsäther
Received on Thursday, 26 May 2005 15:02:46 UTC