Thursday, 30 June 2005
Wednesday, 29 June 2005
- Re: schemas for XML Modularization
- Re: schemas for XML Modularization
- schemas for XML Modularization
- [XHTML2] How are UAs to interpret <h> and <hx> elements?
Sunday, 26 June 2005
Friday, 24 June 2005
Wednesday, 22 June 2005
- Re: Comment on XHTML2 WD: adding a "license" REL
- Re: Comment on XHTML2 WD: adding a "license" REL
- Re: Comment on XHTML2 WD: adding a "license" REL
Tuesday, 21 June 2005
Sunday, 19 June 2005
Friday, 17 June 2005
- colgroup span clarification
- Why no nested colgroup or rowgroup?
- Please clarify "rowgroup"
- XHTML 2.0 Working Draft: Error in example of section 8.9
Monday, 13 June 2005
Saturday, 11 June 2005
- Re: [XHTML2] exclude switch and case as presentational
- Re: [XHTML2] exclude switch and case as presentational
Friday, 10 June 2005
- [XHTML2] exclude switch and case as presentational
- [XHTML2] "case" missing from element index and hyperlinking
- [XHTML2] How are UAs to interpret <h> and <hx> elements?
Wednesday, 8 June 2005
Tuesday, 7 June 2005
- Re: [Moderator Action] Comment: 23. XHTML Metainformation Attributes Module
- Re: Comment - 25. XHTML Role Access Module
Monday, 6 June 2005
Sunday, 5 June 2005
Saturday, 4 June 2005
Friday, 3 June 2005
- Re: WD-xhtml2-20050527: img element not required
- WD-xhtml2-20050527: img element not required
- Re: Comment - 25. XHTML Role Access Module
Thursday, 2 June 2005
- Comment - 25. XHTML Role Access Module
- Re: Change XHTML 2.0 namespace to http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml
- Change XHTML 2.0 namespace to http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml
Wednesday, 1 June 2005
Tuesday, 31 May 2005
- [XHTML 2] Content attribute on all elements
- Re: What's the purpose of these meaningless issue resolution messages?
- Re: What's the purpose of these meaningless issue resolution messages?
- What's the purpose of these meaningless issue resolution messages?
Monday, 30 May 2005
- Re: [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- [XHTML 2] removal of navigation list element
- Namespaces for the values of @property attribute
Sunday, 29 May 2005
- Re: Comments on XHTML 2.0 document conformance requirements
- [XHTML 2] 15 Bi-directional text collection and embedded attributes?
- Comments on XHTML 2.0 document conformance requirements
- The relationship to RDF
- separator abuse
- [XHTML 2] 18.1.1 Rules for processing handlers
- [XHTML 2] Identifying the content type of inline handler.
- [XHTML 2] type handler/srctype
- [XHTML 2] Conforming documents and meta properties
- [XHTML 2] type attribute on the param element
- [XHTML 2] Errors in examples
- [XHTML 2] 17 Embedding Attributes
- [2005-05-27 WD] XHTML2 namespace URI change
- [XHTML 2] 23.2 Meta and RDF
- [XHTML 2] 23.1 metadata attribute collection property
- [XHTML 2] 22.1 Activation of links and retrieval of link targets
- [XHTML 2] XHTML Family User Agents
- [XHTML 2] User agents must number ordered list items
- [XHTML 2] "by default" in 11.3
- [XHTML 2 Appendix H Stylesheet
- [XHTML 2 Appendix H Stylesheet
- [XHTML 1 and 1.1] Activating links within Object.
- [HTML 4.01] Activating links within Object.
- Re: [XHTML 2] Embedding Attributes Examples
- Re: [XHTML 2] Embedded Resources containing links
Saturday, 28 May 2005
- [XHTML2] Spirit of "1.1.3. XHTML 2 and Presentation"
- [XHTML2] Scope of XHTML2
- [XHTML 2] 28.1 Style sheet precedence and inheritance
- [XHTML 2] 25.2 role and QNames in attribute context
- [XHTML 2] 24.1 archive attribute
- [XHTML 2] 24.1.3 delay mp3 playing
- [XHTML 2] 24.2 type attribute
- [XHTML 2] 24.2 Position of param elements
- [XHTML 2] 24.2 Referenced objects not yet defined
- [XHTML 2] 24.1 OBJECT declare and "completed loading"
- [XHTML 2] 20.1 usemap attribute not referencing an nl
- [XHTML 2] 20.1 usemap attribute
- [XHTML 2] ismap attribute "screen pixel"
- [XHTML 2] ismap attribute URI creation
- [XHTML 2] ismap attribute and unsuccessful embedded attribute
- [XHTML 2] ismap attribute click location
- [XHTML 2] Image Map Attribute
- [XHTML 2] 19.1 the img element
- [XHTML 2] 18.1.3 document.write
- [XHTML 2] 18.1.1 Handler processing rules
- [XHTML 2] 18.1.2 type confusion
- [XHTML 2] Embedding Attributes Examples
- [XHTML 2] 17 Clipping of embedded documents to viewport.
- [XHTML 2] Embedded Resources containing links
- [XHTML 2] Embedding XHTML Resources Linking.
- [XHTML 2] 17 Embedding Attributes - srcType
- [XHTML 2] Embedding attributes and nextFocus
- [XHTML 2] 17.1 Encoding attribute
- 17 Embedding Attributes - Invalid XHTML 2 documents
- 17 Embedding Attributes User aborted downloads.
- 17 Embedding Attributes Success/Failure status codes.
- [XHTML 2] 13.1 Hypertext Attributes Module - nextfocus
- [XHTML 2] 13.1 Hypertext Attributes Module - hreflang
- [XHTML 2] 13.1 Hypertext Attributes Module
- Re: Styling embedding attributes (PR#7655)
- [XHTML 2] 9.1 the abbr element full attribute
- [XHTML 2] xsi:schemaLocation
- [XHTML 2] Section 5.5 intersection of mime-types
- [XHTML 2] Section 5.5 quality values.
- [XHTML 2] Section 3.2
- [XHTML 2] Section 3.1.1
- [XHTML 2] Section 3.1.1
Friday, 27 May 2005
Saturday, 28 May 2005
- Re: Formal Response to My issue on styling embedding attributes. (PR#7655)
- Re: Styling embedding attributes (PR#7655)
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - 3.2 Conformance Requirements (PR#7651)
Friday, 27 May 2005
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - 3.2 Conformance Requirements (PR#7651)
- Re: Formal Response to My issue on styling embedding attributes. (PR#7655)
- Re: Styling embedding attributes (PR#7655)
- On introducing a fallback attribute
- Re: Formal Response to My issue on styling embedding attributes. (PR#7655)
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - 3.2 Conformance Requirements (PR#7651)
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - 3.2 Conformance Requirements (PR#7651)
- Re: XHTML 2 Issue handling
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - 3.2 Conformance Requirements (PR#7651)
Thursday, 26 May 2005
- Formal Response to My issue on styling embedding attributes.
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - 3.2 Conformance Requirements (PR#7651)
- Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
- Re: XHTML 2 Issue handling
- Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
- Re: Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
- Re: XHTML 2 Issue handling
- Comments on the XHTML 2.0 WD
- Re: are XHTML semantics taken from HTML4?
- Re: XHTML 2 Issue handling
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - 3.2 Conformance Requirements (PR#7651)
- Re: XHTML 2.0 - 3.2 Conformance Requirements (PR#7651)