- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 06:13:59 +0200
- To: www-html-editor@w3.org
Dear HTML Working Group, I told you at least twice already, but I will say it again. Appendix C.14 in the XHTML 1.0 Second Edition Recomendation seems misplaced, it states already in the heading [...] C.14. Referencing Style Elements when serving as XML [...] While the entire appendix is about *serving as HTML*. So what is the section doing there? What is the actual requirement for authors who wish to deliver their XHTML documents to legacy user agents? I am unable to work that out. It seems that this should be mentioned in section 3.1, "Document Conformance". But before you do that let me point out again why this section makes no sense at all. If there is some kind of user agent that does not support <link> to reference style sheets, the <style> element or the style attribute, it is most certainly not a XHTML user agent and would thus most likely not support other XHTML features like hyperlinks, scripts or forms which already makes it a rather questionable effort to introduce redundant markup to somehow improve a completly broken presentation of the document. The user agent would further most likely lack a default style sheet for XHTML documents so that the presentation is likely a broken mess of the possibly colored concatenated character data of the document as the initial value for the 'display' property in CSS 2.0 is 'inline'. I thus completly fail to see how this could possibly add considerable value to a considerable percentage of existing XHTML documents. It does not even make sense for XHTML user agents as those are not required to support the xml-stylesheet processing instruction. And that is just the most significant flaw of the section. regards.
Received on Monday, 12 July 2004 00:14:43 UTC