- From: Christopher Maloney <dude@chrismaloney.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 00:32:31 -0500
- To: mimasa@w3.org;, www-html-editor@w3.org
Regards, I was playing around with the example from this specification, and came across some errors. Naturally, I checked the errata document (http://www.w3.org/2001/04/REC-xhtml-modularization-20010410-errata), and it says "None at this time." I then searched and read the email archives of this list (www-html-editor@w3.org) and found that many of these errors have been reported *ages* ago (2001!). What gives? Why isn't the errata document (and, for that matter, the Rec. itself) being maintained? Clearly, a lot of developers are using this, and I, for one, see it as a very valuable specification. This has been a frustrating experience. Any reply would be greatly appreciated! Thanks! Christopher Maloney http://www.chrismaloney.com dude@chrismaloney.com
Received on Friday, 14 November 2003 17:33:15 UTC