Re: Mod'n of XHTML in XML Schema: spec not well-formed! from Daniel_Austin@grainger.com on 2003-01-29 (www-html-editor@w3.org from January to March 2003)

From: <Daniel_Austin@grainger.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:52:14 -0600
To: www-html-editor@w3.org, w3c-html-wg@w3.org, mf@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF3910AFC3.6865DCBC-ON86256CBD.0053DFC5@grainger.com>

Hi,

      Thank you very much for your feedback. This is a good point. It's not
at all clear to me how these "/" characters disappeared. This is most
likely a publishing artifact. A point will be made to address this in the
next version. Thanks again!

Regards,

D-

To: www-html-editor@w3.org
From: Max Froumentin <mf@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 11:25:01 +0100
Message-ID: <86el7mk4ci.fsf@sophia.inria.fr>
Subject: Re: Mod'n of XHTML in XML Schema: spec not well-formed!

Max Froumentin <mf@w3.org> writes:

> Trying to validate the Overview.html file with the provided schema, I
> notice that it is not well-formed: all the empty elements lack the
> trailing /.

I just realised that it's the Overview.html file from the tgz archive
that was wrong.

Max.

Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2003 10:52:20 UTC