- From: John Lewis <lewi0371@mrs.umn.edu>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 19:50:48 -0500
- To: www-html-editor@w3.org
I think the definition of the l element should read something more like this: The l element represents a semantic line of text (e.g., a line of verse or a line of computer code). It is intended as a structured replacement for the br element. When visually represented, the l element should start on a new line and have a line break at the end. Whether the line should wrap or not depends on styling properties of the element. Which is in my opinion much clearer. It's especially important to separate the current paragraph (reproduced below), which talks about what the l element is as well as how it should be visually rendered in one breath. That's a mistake because it leads people to believe that the l element is just a renamed, slightly different version of the br element, when in reality it's fundamentally different. Here is the current definition: The l element contains a sub-paragraph that represents a sinle line of text. It is intended as a structured replacement for the br element. It contains a piece of text that when visually represented should start on a new line, and have a line break at the end. Whether the line should wrap or not visually depends on styling properties of the element. -- John Lewis
Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2003 20:51:06 UTC