- From: Toby A Inkster <tobyink@goddamn.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 07:29:12 +0100
- To: Ernest Cline <ernestcline@mindspring.com>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org, www-html-editor@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
Received on Friday, 4 April 2003 01:29:14 UTC
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 12:52:14AM -0500, Ernest Cline wrote:
| If there
| were no earlier (X)HTML standards, I think that separator model would
| be clearly the superior. If XHTML2 was not already engaged in the
| pruning of existing (X)HTML elements, then markup elements would
| clearly be the preferred choice. However, the earlier standards do
| exist and XHTML2 is pruning a significant number of (X)HTML elements,
| meaning that the choice must be made on another basis.
An argument against it is this. Your &ls; entity would be effectively
and semantically the same as <br/> which is one of the elements we're
actively tring to get rid of!
--
Toby A Inkster BSc (Hons) ARCS | mailto:tobyink@goddamn.co.uk | pgp:0x6A2A7D39
aim:inka80 | icq:6622880 | yahoo:tobyink | jabber:tobyink@a-message.de
http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/ | "You've got spam!"
playing://(nothing)
Received on Friday, 4 April 2003 01:29:14 UTC