- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 00:20:58 +0100
- To: "Micah Dubinko" <mdubinko@yahoo.com>, <www-html-editor@w3.org>, "HTML WG" <w3c-html-wg@w3.org>
Actually the underlying idea goes much deeper: why are attributes unstructured in XML? See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-plenary/2000Mar/0000.html for a discussion by Henry Thompson. Best wishes, Steven Pemberton ----- Original Message ----- From: "Micah Dubinko" <mdubinko@yahoo.com> To: <www-html-editor@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 6:57 PM Subject: Research: "Elemental XHTML" > > Greetings, > > I have been thinking recently about some of the innovations in XHTML > 2.0, such as widespread linking attributes. It's probably at least > worth looking at other ways the vocabulary can be normalized. > > With that, I'd like to point you to a paper called "Elemental XHTML", > which takes a look at what XHTML would look like if it avoided using > attributes: > > * to contain human-readable text > * to contain lists > * to contain 'micro-parsed' values > > The result is located at > http://dubinko.info/writing/elemental/ > > I hope you find this information useful. > > Thanks, > > .micah > > ===== > Find out what the fuss about XForms is all about. Full text of my book in-progress online at http://dubinko.info/writing/xforms/ > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > http://mailplus.yahoo.com > > >
Received on Monday, 9 December 2002 18:21:01 UTC