- From: Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:42:52 +0900 (JST)
- To: james.anderson@setf.de
- Cc: www-html-editor@w3.org
james anderson <james.anderson@setf.de> wrote:
> as a related issue, an unfortunate circumstance is that the draft
> includes in the normative document type declaration the same system
> identifier as the earlier recommentation. which is neither the erroneous
> one, nor a corrected one, but the one from the recommendation.
That's intentional. As clearly noted in the "status of this document"
section [2], this document is still a Working Draft and should not be
used as reference material. When the second edition becomes a
Recommendation, the latest DTDs can be referenced by the URIs shown
in the specification. Until then, those URIs point to the current
Recommendation version of XHTML 1.0 DTDs.
> it would
> be nice if a corresponding correct dtd were available independent of
> publication cycles.
DTDs are available, and can be referenced through "dated" URIs, like:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xhtml1-20011004/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xhtml1-20011004/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xhtml1-20011004/DTD/xhtml1-frameset.dtd
> > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html-editor/2001OctDec/0078
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xhtml1-20011004/#status
Regards,
--
Masayasu Ishikawa / mimasa@w3.org
W3C - World Wide Web Consortium
Received on Monday, 28 January 2002 22:43:01 UTC