- From: Peter Norrington <pnorrington@tesco.net>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 00:25:57 +0100
- To: www-html-editor@w3.org
Dear www-html-editor, Preamble: I am trying to implement WAI-AA (or even AAA) for a public sector site, although I write this in a personal capacity. I wanted to check a primary source for a better understanding of accessibility implementation. I happened to be reading the XHTML 1.0 document at http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xhtml1-20011004/ , noting that this page claims WAI-AAA conformance. I used Bobby 3.2 to analyze the document. I assume that A and B below are typos. However C through F raise other issues, especially as other W3C documents also share them, such as: are they not important for WAI-AAA after all? A) There is one instance of a deprecated element, <i>. Lines 1132-1133, "<I lang=lt xml:lang="lt">et al.</I>" It also seems a bit obscure to mark "et al." as Latin, as it is standard bibliographic terminology in English. Would a speech reader seriously and meaningfully attempt to pronounce this with Latin phonetics? B) Priority 2: Separate adjacent links with more than whitespace. Lines 968-969 (indicated here with reduced code), "See <a>[HTML]</a> <a>Section 6.2</a> for more information." under "C.8 Fragment Identifiers." C) Priority 3: Use metadata to add computer-understandable information about the page. # There is very little, confined to the meta's http-equiv=Content-Type and name=GENERATOR. D) Priority 3: Specify a logical tab order among form controls, links and objects. # There are no "tabindexes." E) Priority 3: Provide metadata that identifies this document's location in a collection. # This is not provided. F) Priority 3: Consider adding keyboard shortcuts to frequently used links. # There are no "accesskeys." I hope this assists you in editing the document. If you are able to respond to the issues, or direct me somewhere that can, I would appreciate this. In the latter case, I did not find the information in the WAI guidelines to be sufficient to be sure that I actually implement them correctly: the guideline examples raise more questions than they answer. Yours faithfully, Peter Norrington pnorrington@tesco.net
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2001 14:27:56 UTC