- From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
- Date: 04 Feb 2001 15:54:16 -0500
- To: www-html-editor@w3.org
- Cc: debian-sgml@list.debian.org, 75072@bugs.debian.org
In WD-xhtml11-20000105, Section 3, we read: The XHTML 1.1 document type is made up of the following abstract modules: Structure, Basic Text, Hypertext, List, Applet, Presentation, Edit, BDO, Forms, Tables, Image, Image Map, Intrinsic Events, Metainformation, Scripting, Stylesheet, and Link as defined in [XHTMLMOD], and the Ruby Annotation module as defined in [RUBY]. There are no additional definitions required by this document type. An implementation of this document type as an XML DTD is defined in Appendix C. No problem so far. However, xhtml11.dtd contains <!ENTITY % xhtml-framework.mod PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES XHTML 1.1 Modular Framework 1.0//EN" "xhtml11-framework-1.mod" > Yet, on the other hand, no such file "xhtml11-framework-1.mod" is provided in xhtml-modularization, at least not in the latest available draft, CR-xhtml-modularization-20001020 . Rather, in that candidate recommendation, we do find the file "xhtml-framework-1.mod". The only place I could find a file with that name was at <URL:http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/examples/xhtml/> Yet those files seem to diverge, and I am unsure of what status if any the ibiblio files have. As a packager, attempting to provide working XHTML 1.1 materials to document engineers or authors trying to try out the modular system, I'm a bit at a loss, and the W3C materials do not seem to constitute a working whole. Recommended remedy: Either modify the materials from CR-xhtml-modularization-20001020 to provide the vesioned (1.1) files, or else remove the 1.1 versioning from the references to the modularized XHTML in the XHTML 1.1 spec. -- .....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Received on Sunday, 4 February 2001 15:53:57 UTC