- From: Tapio Markula <tapio1@gamma.nic.fi>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 10:49:18 +0200
- To: www-html-editor@w3.org
To categorize matters is not easy and even W3C has some difficulties in it. IF the original idea of HTML 3.0 Draft could be followed, SUP and SUB should have OWN 'Inline Mathematical' group and that group could belong to basic XHTML. The XML Math Language could be a logical extension to SUP and SUB. THIS might be the best solution? Compare: BDO - Ruby as I18n elements SUB/SUB + Math as 'Mathematical' elements. The XML Mathematical language could be logical extension, but some of it could belong to the basic DTD. I categorize at this way here: http://www.nic.fi/~tapio1/Teaching/AttributesHTML30.html and I put comments concerning this matter also to http://www.nic.fi/~tapio1/Teaching/Attributes.html - I explain the main aims of the HTML 3.0 Draft. the draft doesn't tell exactly, which are inline and block level elements, and the list might have errors. HTML 3.0 Draft was fine trial - the basic categorization of it today a valid base to XHTML. ------------------------------------------------------ Tapio Markula I like __ ¦__¦__ Cascading ¦__¦__¦__ Style ¦__¦__¦__¦ Sheets I have made something also with XML and XSL ------------------------------------------------------ E:mail: tapio.markula@nic.fi http://www.nic.fi/~tapio1/index.html (Finnish) http://www.nic.fi/~tapio1/index_e.html (English) http://www.nic.fi/~tapio1/Opetus/ (CSS2) http://www.nic.fi/~tapio1/Teaching/ (CSS2) http://www.nic.fi/~tapio1/Opetus/XSL-new.html (XML) http://www.nic.fi/~tapio1/Teahing/XSL-new.html (XML) ------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 21 November 2000 03:43:27 UTC