- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 17:35:29 -0400
- To: "Larry Masinter" <masinter@attlabs.att.com>, "Mark Baker" <mark.baker@canada.sun.com>
- Cc: <mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp>, <www-html-editor@w3.org>, <dan@dankohn.com>
At 02:29 PM 7/26/00 -0700, Larry Masinter wrote: >Forget I asked. What about the wording as I suggested it? This looks fine to me: (I haven't changed it, just got rid of the >) -------------------------------- An XML document labelled as text/xml or application/xml might contain namespace declarations, stylesheet-linking PIs, schema information, or other declarations that might be used to suggest how the document is to be processed. For example, a document might have the XHTML namespace and a reference to a CSS stylesheet. Such document might be handled by applications that would use this information to dispatch to the appropriate processing. -------------------------------- 'Might' seems to address the current situation perfectly, adding the right amount of contingency throughout. Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2000 17:32:55 UTC