Re: Liaison statement on fragment identifiers from Linking WG

At 14:38 1999 05 26 +0200, Steven Pemberton wrote:
>Lauren Wood writes:
> > Can someone please help me clear my confusion? I've read this 
> > thread to mean that XHTML is keeping the A NAME attribute as 
> > being of type CDATA, but the actual DTD at 
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/xhtml1-19990505/DTD/transitional.dtd
> > says it is of type ID, and the ID attribute is of type NMTOKEN.
>
>Lauren, thanks for noticing this. We changed the DTD as a result of 
>the Linking group's initial message in this thread, and then failed to 
>undo the change after our FtF.
>
>It should now be fixed.

Where?  I just went to the above URL, and it's not fixed, so I
assume you have the latest DTD elsewhere--which makes sense, but
then can you tell us where it is?

Received on Wednesday, 26 May 1999 11:59:13 UTC