- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 15:17:53 -0500
- To: jmkgre@essex.ac.uk
- CC: www-html-editor@w3.org
J M K Green wrote: > > Hi there, > > I've just been in discussion with a tech bod at www.netmachanic.com > about frames in their HTML validator. The subject of compatibility > between the new HTML 4.0 specification and the older one provided by > Netscape and Microsoft and now used by *a lot* of people cropped up as > being of vital importance. > > Basically, I tried to convert my index.htm which contains frames and a > noframes area into the HTML 4.0 specification, and NN 3 promptly > displayed nothing at all. If we are to use the new 4.0 specification, > how are we to cater for older (pre 4.0 release) browsers who's document > structure definition is, er, rather different? Surely a front page of: > > Click here for pre 4.0 browsers, > > or Here otherwise. > > cannot be justified, or am I getting things totally wrong? > > Please clarrify your position on this matter. Hello, Maximizing compatibility between versions of HTML is one of the HTML Working Group's primary concerns. However, at times the Working Group considers certain changes so important, that they agree to the changes in spite of the risk that these changes may "break" existing documents. In your case, I'm not certain what change in the frames specification has provoked the error. You would have to send us the frame documents in question, or, better yet, a reduced version of the document that produces the same results in NN 3. Thank you, Ian Jacobs
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 1997 15:18:32 UTC