- From: Gerald Oskoboiny <gerald@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 20:17:54 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-html-editor@w3.org
Some of the DTD-related errors in my previous mail could be introduced accidentally any time, so I think it's important that any future errors get flagged by a "make check". As you know, right now a "make check" runs nsgmls against all the HTML files in the specification. However, since all the HTML files produced use the "Transitional" doctype, "make check" doesn't currently flag any errors in the strict or loose DTDs. So I suggest that a mini- test suite be added somewhere with a couple extra trivial HTML files with each of the 3 possible doctypes, to at least make sure each DTD gets parsed by invoking nsgmls against the appropriate document. Of course, even better would be a thorough test suite with a bunch of complex HTML documents that really exercise each DTD, but that's a lot of work, and I don't mean to suggest that now as I know you're very busy. (Besides, Dan would probably say that's my job as the HTML validation service guy, and I'm also very busy. :) But adding the minimal test suite I describe above shouldn't be much work at all, and it would ensure that there are no bugs accidentally introduced to DTDs in the future. Gerald -- Gerald Oskoboiny <gerald@w3.org> +1 617 253 2920 System Administrator, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Gerald/ World Wide Web Consortium, MIT Labatory for Computer Science 545 Technology Square, Room NE43-353 Cambridge MA 02139 USA
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 1997 20:18:31 UTC