- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 15:21:47 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: www-html-editor@w3.org
Dan Connolly wrote: > > Please strike the two notes in > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Group/9710/WD-html40-971024/struct/global.html#h-8.2 > > "Experience suggests that these terms were ineffective so they are not > being > proposed for HTML 4.0. " > > The were ineffective because we used them slopilly: we > issued a spec that gave plain "HTML 3.2" *before* we > started issues specs that said "HTML 3.2 draft". > > The bell was already struck. Removed. > "We recommend that authors avoid using the DTD subset due to the lack of > widespread support for this feature. " > > In fact, we require that. Strike the note and change > "should" to "must" in: > > "so authors should include one of the following..." Done. The corresponding section was removed from http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Group/9710/WD-html40-971024/appendix/notes.html#sgmlfeatures and the illegal example placed here. Ian -- Ian Jacobs / 401 Second Ave. #19G / New York, NY 10010 USA Tel/Fax: (212) 684-1814 Email: ibjacobs@panix.com
Received on Sunday, 26 October 1997 15:22:14 UTC