- From: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 07:41:14 -0400 ()
- To: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>
- cc: www-html-editor@w3.org
On Sat, 20 Sep 1997, MegaZone wrote: > Page 103-104 - width def: It would be most helpful to me if you could give the section number and title, so I can find the thing you are referring to online, as I don't have a hardcopy of the spec with me. Thanks for spotting *0 this is indeed a typo and should be 0*. > In the long table code sample on page 111 you sometimes fill in all of > the columns by putting in empty cells (<TD></TD>), but sometimes you do > not... Oh, let me go find it online to make it easy. :-) > Now, I know that on the two short rows it will be filled in by the > UA. But my concern is with novices who are reading this, and who > tend to put weight on any inconsitency as 'meaning something'. > I'd either fill them all in to 5 columns total, or don't bother > with the dummy cells. Thanks for spotting this inconsistent style. You presumably guessed that the table was created by hand. I will follow your suggestion and pad out all rows fully. > Question: > > Both COLGROUP and COL have a 'span' attribute. I see that COL's > span has a special value of '0' which mwans to span the remaining > columns. Yet it does not appear that COLGROUPS's span has the > same special value. Is this an oversight, or is it deliberate? I think this is an oversight dating back to 1995 when we were working on tables in the IETF, work which led to RFC 1942. I don't want to change this now as this would cause problems for current implementations. > Suggestion. For consistency, can the special value be changed to > 0* to match width's 0* and i*? You know people are going to get > them confused with two attributes on the same element with special > values so close to being the same. An interesting idea, a shame we didn't think of this in 1995. However, I am not free to change this as it may break current implementations. span is formally defined as NUMBER and adding "*" as a suffix may cause problems. I will ask the HTML working group if this would indeed be problematic. Regards, -- Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett phone: +44 122 578 2521 (office) +44 385 320 444 (gsm mobile) World Wide Web Consortium (on assignment from HP Labs)
Received on Monday, 22 September 1997 07:46:18 UTC