oops... got the address wrong the first time.
--
Dan
http://www.w3.org/Team/connolly
phone://1/512/310-2971
Forwarded message 1
I just noticed:
==========
http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-html40/struct/links.html#h-7.6.2.3
The A element may define an anchor, a link, or both.
==========
The A element *always* defines an anchor. A link
consists of two anchors: the source and destination
(a whole document is also an anchor).
========
The id and name attributes share the same name space (see [ISO10646]).
========
What has ISO10646 got to do with the ID/NAME namespace?
The spec currently makes it sound like ID/NAME share a namespace
for some reason defined by ISO10646 or the SGML spec. That's not
the reason. This notion is novel to the HTML spec.
The whole link section in the 8 July draft is goofy.
--
Dan
http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/