W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html-editor@w3.org > July to September 1997

HTML recommendations just for passing time?

From: Jan D. <jan.djarv@mbox200.swipnet.se>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 15:54:24 +0200
Message-ID: <33D60D10.2DD95DD4@mbox200.swipnet.se>
To: www-html-editor@w3.org

I notice that none of the HTML 4.0 html-pages follow your own
recommendations.  All but one lack doctype, and the one that doesn't
does not pass validation acc. to its doctype.

Does this mean that W3C is not taking its own recommendation very
seriously, and that W3C is just a place for some people to spend their
time inventing recommendation that noone really cares about, especially
not the people that did the recommendations in the first place?

Why should anybody care about HTML 3.2 and 4.0 since obviously you
don't?  If it is too hard for you to make HTML-pages acc. to your
recommendations, why bother with the recommendation in the first place?

	Jan D.
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 1997 09:52:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:39:05 UTC