- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:26:58 -0700
- To: Alain Couthures <alain.couthures@agencexml.com>
- Cc: "www-forms@w3.org" <www-forms@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF9AACAFA2.3BCC83C6-ON88257872.005A262C-88257872.005A5C09@ca.ibm.com>
Hi Alain, xsd:string is the almost-right datatype, and so there has been no priority on doing better. normalizedString does stuff to a string that we would not want. The exact right datatype would be one pattern derived from string with the regex pattern [^\n] as the only thing input really says differently than textarea is single line input. Cheers, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. Distinguished Engineer, IBM Forms and Smarter Web Applications IBM Canada Software Lab, Victoria E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw From: Alain Couthures <alain.couthures@agencexml.com> To: "www-forms@w3.org" <www-forms@w3.org> Date: 04/14/2011 09:03 AM Subject: normalizedString/input and string/textarea? Sent by: www-forms-request@w3.org Hello, I'm still perplex about the differences between core forms input controls. More specifically, if I want to edit an instance according to types, I would consider that xsd:string is not correct for xf:input but for xf:textarea. It is obvious that the carriage return, line feed and tab characters cannot be entered using xf:input but xf:textarea. So, why isn't xsd:normalizedString the default type for xf:input? Thank you very much for your answers! Alain Couthures <agenceXML> http://www.agencexml.com/xsltforms
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 16:27:29 UTC